Wednesday, October 31, 2007
Anonymous sources
Despite promises to curtail it, the LAT published this morning a front page Halloween scare story based on anonymous sources about the danger of an unintentional clash between U.S. and Iranian forces in Iraq, and the potential danger that such a clash could escalate into full fledged war. It could be a true story, but then it could be a figment of a reporter's imagination. The sources might be high level people with knowledge of the subject. Then again, they could be clerks or secretaries or mid-level people anxious to get in the newspaper. If the newspaper had named its sources, readers could evaluate the sources and decide whether or not to believe the story. The LAT would surely argue that they should be trusted. If the newspaper did not have a bias, that might be possible.
Thursday, October 25, 2007
Choices are easy for LAT
In testimony before the Senate judiciary panel, the nominee for attorney general, Michael Mukasey, said that if water-boarding is torture then it is illegal, but he also said he didn't know if it's torture. Seems reasonable. He's a judge who sits behind a desk most of the time. What could he know about water-boarding. That doesn't bother LAT editorial writers though, who also mostly sit around. They think they're experts on water-boarding -- after all, they've read all the blogs. Mukasey was right to withhold judgement until he learns more about the subject, perhaps by observing it.
Wednesday, October 24, 2007
LAT on Christian right
The LAT editorializes this morning, arguing that the Christian right is shooting itself in the foot by insisting that it can only support anti-abortion presidential candidates. You wonder what the purpose of this editorial was. Was the LAT trying to help these Christians by giving them good advice? Nah. The LAT says it's pleased that these Christians are taking that position. Maybe the LAT sees the Christian right as an easy target, like President Bush and Blackwater.
Monday, October 22, 2007
O. C. Register found a smoking gun, sort of
In an editorial today, the Orange County Register says it found something in court documents of a case involving Quest Communications that suggests the government may have pressured Quest to provide customer call records to the NSA before 9/11. The problem is, the "something" was a mere allegation which the government denied. The Register admits it may mean nothing. So why base an editorial on it?
The Register is anxious to prove that the Bush administration violated the law or the constitution when it authorized the NSA's electronic surveillance program and claims that Americans' telephone calls and e-mail messages may have been intercepted without a warrant. But no American has thus far said his or her calls or messages have been intercepted. Until that happens and is proven to have happened, the Register and others are tilting at windmills.
The Register is anxious to prove that the Bush administration violated the law or the constitution when it authorized the NSA's electronic surveillance program and claims that Americans' telephone calls and e-mail messages may have been intercepted without a warrant. But no American has thus far said his or her calls or messages have been intercepted. Until that happens and is proven to have happened, the Register and others are tilting at windmills.
LAT sop to Turks
Apparently to take the pressure off the lunatic congressional Democrats, who propose to stick their collective finger in the collective eye of our allies the Turks, the LAT this morning chastises President Bush and General Petraeus for not doing more to help Turkey wipe out the PKK in northern Iraq. The LAT wants the U.S. to join Turkey in a military adventure under a NATO umbrella aimed at eliminating the PKK. In other words, go ahead with the finger but put some American lives at risk so the Turks won't get mad. Makes sense if it's not your life and you have no qualms about risking others for a political purpose.
Sunday, October 21, 2007
LAT's Levey returns
LAT reporter Noam Levey, a Democrat propagandist, hasn't had a byline piece in the newspaper recently, thankfully, but he's back today with a piece about a Republican congressman from North Carolina who is about to lose his seat because he no longer votes with his party on national security issues. Levey seems to think that the congressman is being treated unfairly and the LAT seems to think it's front page news. Both are twisted views of routine reactions by constituents to votes the congressman has taken.
Levey also laments the decision of Chuck Hagel not to seek reelection to the Senate. Hagel has lost the confidence of the people he represents. Why should he return to the Senate?
Friday, October 19, 2007
LAT applauds divorce
The LAT argues today in an editorial that Americans should be more like the French, a sentiment that appeals to the left. Today's subject is the divorce of Nicholas and Cecilia Sarkozy,which the LAT claims is a good thing, about which the French people seem to be unconcerned. Why the LAT should feel the need to applaud divorce isn't clear.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)