Friday, November 30, 2007
LAT evaluates GOP debaters
You Tube and presidential debates
Those who choose not to watch these debates -- because they are farce more than serious debating -- rely mainly on descriptions of the debates supplied by media outlets like the LAT, WaPo, WSJ, Fox News, Lehrer's NewsHour, etc. Therefore, these non-watchers lack first hand knowledge of questions and questioners. However, from the descriptions provided it seems clear that video questioners are selected based on how ridiculous they appear. You must munch on a corn cob or do something similarly stupid to get selected as a questioner, it seems. Given that, it's hard to get excited about whether the questions and questioners are biased, which they clearly are
Thursday, November 29, 2007
Petruno AWOL
Wednesday, November 28, 2007
Petruno of the LAT
LAT targets McCain
Tuesday, November 27, 2007
LAT fails to report Congress' failure to act on AMT
LAT reads Lott's mind
LAT: propaganda machine
The LAT is not a newspaper. It's a propaganda machine.
Monday, November 26, 2007
LAT promotes government healthcare
Saturday, November 24, 2007
LAT's Petruno is repetitive
LAT calls Romney too perfect
Friday, November 23, 2007
Petruno of the LAT
LAT on Supremes
The LAT also argues that Democrat presidential candidates have been clearer on promising to appoint justices that will uphold Roe v Wade than Rudy Guiliani has been on promising not to. But the LAT's arguments are unpersuasive.
Monday, November 19, 2007
Concerning TSA
If another 9/11 should happen, there would be hell to pay if the government had not at least tried to improve airport security. Therefore, something like TSA is necessary even if ineffective because it makes it appear that the government is trying to do something. With better people, better training and better management, TSA could be effective, but that isn't likely.
Hopeful sign from the LAT?
Sunday, November 18, 2007
LAT on Obama
Thursday, November 15, 2007
LAT on working gays
Do we need this? How big a problem is this? The LAT doesn't say. It only says that arguments against are invalid, illegitimate, false -- because the LAT says so.
Wednesday, November 14, 2007
LAT instructs the pope
Who writes these pompous editorials?
LAT ignores Dow rise -- almost
Tuesday, November 13, 2007
Ticking time bombs
The subject of the editorial is torture, something that has captured liberals' attention like nothing since ... what? Taxing the rich? Beating up on Bush?
Liberals are certain that the the U.S. has tortured but they have no proof. They can't even define torture. They were not concerned about torture when Slick Willie was president. Chances are, they'll forget about it if Hillary or Obama gets elected.
LAT on Romney
Monday, November 12, 2007
LAT reports honorably on Bush and Vets
LAT repeats Thompson mantra
Saturday, November 10, 2007
LAT annoints Giuliani
Friday, November 9, 2007
LAT on Giuliani/Robertson
Giuliani likely didn't ask LAT editors for advice and probably wouldn't listen to them. Were they offering advice? Not likely. Most likely, they were painting Robertson as a kook and Giuliani as desperate for his support.
LAT on Blackwater, again
LAT anticipates recession
Thursday, November 8, 2007
LAT on Giuliani
LAT highlights Dow drop
Wednesday, November 7, 2007
Patrick Leahy lies
If Congress wants to outlaw waterboarding it can. If the president vetoes they can override. Leahy and company can't legitimately insist on enforcement of laws that Congress hasn't passed.