"Gay" -- who defines it

The LAT has a front page piece today about a young guy who took his own life because, they say, he was gay and kids at school treated him badly. Didn't read the whole thing but the thought occurred: how do they know he was gay? So far as this old fool knows, there's no infallible test for that. No app for that, you might say if you wanted to add a little humor to a dismal subject. The paper said he thought he was gay and that his mother thought so too. That doesn't make it so, necessarily. They might both have been wrong.

It's a tragedy when any young person loses his or her life. It's worse when a newspaper uses such a tragedy to sell newspapers or to promote a lifestyle that the newspaper favors. It appears that the LAT did both.

LA teachers threaten lawsuit

Some LA teachers may lose their jobs and the union isn't happy about it, according to the LAT. The union plans to sue the school district.

Great. Sue or strike. The union gets its way. The students and their parents and the taxpayers be damned. Why were public employees ever allowed to unionize? Schools were better before unions. Perhaps governments were as well. It's certain that schools and governments were less costly before unionization.

Philosophically, it doesn't make sense to pay public employees well because that means you'll get more of them. They ought to be paid just enough to attract the minimum number needed. There is no magic formula for determining the minimum number or the right pay level but we know that what we have now is too much pay and too many public employees. It's time to cut both down a little.

Global warming

Southern California has been rained on the last three days. Highly unusual. It never rains before November. Must be global warming. Last week the heat was record-breaking, exceeding 100 degrees near the beach. Highly unusual. Must be global warming. The summer was cooler than usual with only a couple of short hot spells. Must be global warming.

LAT absolves Whitman, then says she's guilty

In an editorial today, the LAT acknowledges that Meg Whitman did what she ought to have done about her illegal household help. She got the woman through an employment agency who should have checked her credentials, and presumably did. Meg withheld on wages and reported them to IRS and Social Security. When the woman finally admitted being illegal Meg let her go.

But that's not enough according to the LAT. Meg should have reported the woman to the Border Patrol or the Immigration Service. Otherwise, Meg is inconsistent. According to the LAT, Meg's is arguing in her campaign rhetoric that illegals already in the U.S. should be sent back where they came from.

Maybe but not likely. Hardly anyone seems to be arguing that all the illegals already in the U.S. should be sent home. Rather, the argument seems to be that the borders should be closed so that no new illegals can cross. What to do with those already here can be discussed and debated after the borders are closed.

LAT boosts Democrats

The LAT tries, at least. The LAT's Kathleen Hennessey writes in today's newspaper that Democrats seem to be successful in painting Republican opponents as extremists by exposing embarrassing comments made during campaigns or in earlier life -- Christine O'Donnell's reference to witches in her early life or her arguing against masturbation while appearing on MTV, for example.

But George Will explains in today's Orange County Register that this isn't new and he argues that Democrats stoop to such tactics because they can't run on their records -- Obamacare and the stimulus aren't selling. Will points out that there is "precedent for mainstream media being megaphones for Democratic-manufactured hysteria."

Meg, the employer of an illegal immigrant

The LAT reports today on the controversy concerning the illegal that Meg Whitman and her husband employed for nine years. They refer to the letter from Social Security that Gloria Allred presented at the news conference that supposedly proved that the Whitmans knew about the woman's immigration status when they hired her. But they failed to print the letter in the newspaper.

Show us the letter! If Allred won't allow that then the letter probably doesn't help Allred's case.

Praise for Emanuel

The LAT's Peter Nicholas lauds White House chief of staff Rahm Emanuel in today's newspaper saying Emanuel "steered passage of two major packages: a stimulus bill that experts say prevented a sour economy from getting even worse, and a healthcare overhaul that will provide coverage for 30 million more Americans over the next decade." Nicholas doesn't name the experts he's relying on nor does he acknowledge the possibility that what he claims about Obamacare may not be true.

Instead of lauding Emanuel for steering these two packages, it would make more sense to blame him. The American people seem to think these two packages are not so hot. In fact, they seem to think the Obama administration forced these packages on them against their collective will. They seem to hold the Obama administration and Congressional Democrats responsible and plan to make them pay. We'll see in November.