You could argue that the LAT is intolerant because they're judgmental about the religious right. Or because they don't allow non-journalists to write their editorials. Or because they are selective about which letters they publish. Or because they dumped Michael Ramirez as their editorial cartoonist. If they were really tolerant, they'd have a pro-religious right columnist on their op-ed pages.
People have a right to disagree with the LAT without being called intolerant, hysterical or homophobic.
No comments:
Post a Comment