Tuesday, March 10, 2009

What we need: Judges without judgment

That's the argument a guy from Glendora makes in a letter to the LAT, published today. The letter's closing sentence: "Cases should instead be reviewed individually, without any personal inclination or judgment."

The letter protests Clarence Thomas' consistent holdings supporting states' rights. Apparently, the letter writer is unfamiliar with the Tenth Amendment to our federal constitution, which states: "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people."

No comments: